World Footy Rankings - the inaugural list

Welcome to World Footy News Wednesday, March 25 2026 @ 03:45 am ACDT

World Footy Rankings - the inaugural list | 32 comments | Create New Account

The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.

This site requires you to be logged in to post a comment. If you have an account already (or need to create one), please login here.

World Footy Rankings - the inaugural list

Authored by: Brett Northey
on Wednesday, September 15 2010 @ 11:11 am ACST

Regarding 50% for 9-a-side, I was in favour of including those matches that featured all locals, but the consensus seemed to be not to - my powers of persuasion failed! We try to go with consensus, even though it means I don't always get what I want. 8)

In terms of criteria for teams, including Australia, if the AFL said Australia can field a team at IC2011, and it's in August, Australia would still easily field a great team, there would be plenty of guys volunteering who would either miss their own club finals, or are just returning from injury, or retired the year before, or were having a year off, etc. Or the AFL could just give the elite Under 18s two weeks off. In those conditions I still think Australia would win, so the argument that Australia is still notionally number one holds true. No other country would be able to do that. There have even been very good Australian sides put together in Europe just drawing from expats.

Frankly, although it causes a little disquiet that Australia is given the honorary #1 spot, I think there would be far more concern if they were not ranked #1. It would make the list seem a little farcical. The allowance is pretty much summed up by "could Australia roll out say 25 players that could win the IC tournament, drawn from existing footballers, not training people up from other sports, and not relying on AFL players" and the answer is very clearly "yes", and no other country could do that. If you do want to include AFL players in that, then Ireland probably would jump to #2 with PNG hot on their heels over the next few years, but then there is no real way to measure any of that, we may as well throw out all the match results and revert to an opinion-based ranking system.

I'm hoping in the next 10 years Australia will put up something like an All-Australian Under 20 amateur side to compete at the IC, and then we can throw out the honorary rank and base it on the results (and if they lose then bad luck, they should field an Under 23 side, or open age, or whatever it takes).

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

RSS news	RSS events
Twitter	Facebook

World Footy News

Search

Translate

User Functions

Events

Featured Sites

Older Stories

Friday 11-Apr

Sunday 30-Mar

Thursday 27-Mar

Friday 21-Mar

Thursday 06-Mar

Wednesday 05-Feb

Tuesday 04-Feb

Socials

Who's Online

Random Image

What's New

Articles last 2 weeks

Comments last 2 weeks

Links last 2 weeks

Advertisements