Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Welcome to World Footy News Saturday, February 21 2026 @ 02:53 am ACDT

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11 | 13 comments | Create New Account

The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.

Comments are closed and no new posts are allowed.

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Troy Thompson
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 07:28 am ACST

I am not sure it is strictly an issue of amateur vs professional. There will be a number of guys playing who are paid to play footy whether it be in country leagues, suburban leagues, state leagues or former AFL listed players. It is more a question of legitimate eligibility and the possibility that you end up with an IC champion that has questionable exemptions made that are unfair to other teams.

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Harley Vague
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 10:36 am ACST

This is a really straight forward situation and rightly so.

A player cannot be a product of Australia .To be eligible to play for a country a player must have played AR in that country .That requirement is refined further as to be his formative years not his latter years .

What if the AFL suggest to overseas imports that they have a tryout in a local league (however short) before coming to Australia ? All of sudden the Irish team is AFL reserves standard .

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Troy Thompson
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 11:19 am ACST

I think we may see Aisake oh'Ailpin and Conor Meredith play for Ireland (if they want to) in this IC though (and a number of other Irishmen who may have never played Aussie rules in Ireland).

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Cam Homes
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 11:56 am ACST

Did not oh'Ailpin and Meredith come from the GAA. If they did then they wouldn't be eligible because they've learned all their Aussie rules in Australia not the ARFLI in Ireland.

There are, I believe, some Irishmen who did learn their Aussie rules in Ireland who now live and play here who would be eligible however, and I think they are on the ARFLI's radar to play in the IC.

Cam.

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Troy Thompson
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 12:10 pm ACST

Cam, read their situation in terms of the eligibility rules above. Nothing says they have to have played the game in Ireland as far as I see. Just not predominantly in Australia between 10-16 is the intention and they were obviously in Ireland even if not playing Aussie rules.

By the same token Pyke and McNamara could play for Canada and US respectively if they wanted to play and their clubs let them.

I am pretty sure last time around it was confirmed that Brad Moran would be eligible for GB if he wanted to play and the Crows allowed it.

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Brett Northey
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 01:19 pm ACST

Yes I think Troy is correct in his reading of the rules. And yes I think Moran was eligible however we contacted AFL Great Britain (or maybe it was called the BARFL then) and they said they were only interested in guys who had played in the UK. So eligible - yes, available - probably not, required - no.

This all continues to be an area that has clear rules but the ability to vary them or make exceptions, and which will become increasingly difficult as the IC evolves. As more juniors get involved and AFL talent ID improves, we could easily see a 12 year old play locally for 1 year, then get offered a scholarship to play in Australia and if they go well get it renewed each year. Suddenly you have a gun 17 year old who by the above criteria would not be eligible for their country, whereas I believe they should be able to play. NZ's young ruckman Kurt Heatherly is now Australian-based thanks to Hawthorn. If he'd arrived a year or so earlier I suspect he would technically become ineligible for NZ.

As a parochial South Australian I think of the irony that this international impact all comes from "the Wayne Carey rule". For those that don't know, South Australia beat Victoria in the State-of-Origin match in 1992. SA had the likes of Carey, Modra and Kernahan in the forward line. Carey was well on his way to becoming arguably the greatest centre-half-forward of all time.

The eligibility rule read: "A player (is) to be tied to the state or territory where he was first registered at age 15". For Carey that was SA. The AFL then changed the rule in 1993 to: "A player (is) to be tied to the state or territory where he resided for the majority of the time between ages 10 and 17." That neatly shifted him to NSW. That rule has remained (a recent example was in the All-Stars vs Victoria match in 2008 when Adam Goodes starred for Victoria, after initally thinking he'd be playing for his home state of SA). And now we see it applied internationally. Not saying it is wrong - whatever formula is used there will be players that will end up misplaced because of it.

The other issue is that excellent players are already starting to move to semi-pro and pro Australian teams and some of them will not play in IC11. So the standard has a bit of a ceiling on it, therefore the chances of it growing into a well attended pinnacle event is somewhat limited. These things will come to a head over the next 5 to 20 years, depending on how quickly the sport grows.

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Cam Homes
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 01:42 pm ACST

Troy

Yes, the wording does not appear to rule anybody out, but I believe that the intent is that players learned the game in those formative years 10-16 on their own country.

Take the clause about a players participation "being in the best interests of the competition. If the intent is for the players to be bonifide residents of the participating nation and therefore become Australian Rules footballers representing their country then I believe all the participating nations who are taking part would consider that these players(never been a registered player or even played footy in their home country) would not be allowed to play because it is not in the best interest of the IC concept or competition.

Brett. I don't know if the rules that "state of origin" are even part of the IC eligiblity rules but the intent was the same. I believe that's why the change was made that you mentioned. So that Carey couldn't play for South Australia. He wouldn't be playing for Victoria but more importantly he wouldn't be playing against them.

Lets's face it, who won the most State of Origin matches? :-)

Cam

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Brett Northey
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 03:16 pm ACST

Cam, I think the State of Origin rule (Wayne Carey rule) is virtually the same, so I assume it was just lifted from SOO for use in the IC.

Regarding the clause about a player's participation being in the best interests of the game, I think that section only applies if the player is initially ineligible and looking for an exemption. So by default I think someone raised in Country X from 10 - 16 years but who first starts playing in Australia as an adult is indeed still eligible for Country X if they are still a citizen of that country.

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Aaron Richard
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 04:41 pm ACST

It's important that the IC emphasises the development of players who were legitimately developed outside Australia. But there are quite a few precedents of players who came to Australia as adults, played club footy, then represented their home country without having played there.

David Stynes (younger brother of former Demons Jim and Brian) played for Ireland at the IC 2002, from memory I think he even might have been named player of the tournament. He came to Australia as an adult, but I don't think he'd ever played in Ireland. His home club was listed as the Whitehorse Pioneers, in Melbourne's Eastern FL.

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Cam Homes
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 05:21 pm ACST

Did David Stynes ever play AFL/VFL footy or just today's version of the VFL?

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Aaron Richard
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 10:22 pm ACST

Definitely never played AFL/VFL. I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think he played any VFL/VFA either.

From memory, Brian Stynes played only about 3 senior games for Melbourne, but quite a few seasons for... Port Melbourne maybe?

David I don't think played above Eastern FL, but I could be wrong.

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

Folau, Michael not eligible for IC11

Authored by: Aaron Richard
on Thursday, June 23 2011 @ 10:45 pm ACST

Google suggests that David never played higher than the EFL or SFL, though he did play for Ireland in both the 2002 and 2005 ICs. He is currently playing coach of the Moorabbin Kangas in Melbourne's Southern FL.

Brian returned to Ireland after failing to gain a regular spot with the Dees.

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

RSS news	RSS events
Twitter	Facebook

World Footy News

Search

Translate

User Functions

Events

Featured Sites

Older Stories

Friday 11-Apr

Sunday 30-Mar

Thursday 27-Mar

Friday 21-Mar

Thursday 06-Mar

Wednesday 05-Feb

Tuesday 04-Feb

Socials

Who's Online

What's New

Articles last 2 weeks

Comments last 2 weeks

Links last 2 weeks

Advertisements