One topic that is always guaranteed to stir passionate debate is whether the AFL's rules regarding high contact are an improvement to the game. In the past decade there has been a crackdown on contact to the head, which is variously seen as vital to player welfare and encouraging parents to allow their kids to play the sport, through to an attack on the toughness and spectacular collisions that are part of the sport's great appeal.
Both sides have worthwhile points, but there is little doubt that to maintain a wide supporter and player base, Australian football has needed to change. The cowardly hit to the head was for too long tolerated, with seriously injured players having to accept the assault as "part of the game". In the 1970s it was common for a player, when delivering a hip and shoulder, to jump into the air, such that it was their hip and shoulder, but the other player's head. These days the majority of fans and commentators accept that a tighter interpretation of the rules, protecting against high contact, is worthwhile.
However the rules have been refined further, condemning any player who chooses, rather than go for the ball, to make body contact which ultimately results in high contact and injury. That includes unintentional high contact, even if it was caused by unexpected behaviour from that other player. But have the changes put the game on course to cause increasing numbers of serious injuries throughout all levels of the sport?